zondag 20 augustus 2006

Welke "liberaal" heeft het volgende gezegd?

Ik zou zeggen, probeer het eens zonder het met copy and paste in google in te geven. Je kan wel aan de stijl en de atmosfeer zien dat het niet van de twintigste eeuw is; maar van welke eeuw dan wel? Als iemand zin heeft het als quiz te proberen, laat hij dan met de juiste eeuw antwoorden - ik hou zelf teveel van ronde getallen om te eisen dat het op een paar jaar juist is.

Hier gaan we:

Our political system does not compete with institutions which are elsewhere in force. We do not copy our neighbors, but try to be an example. Our administration favors the many instead of the few: this is why it is called a democracy. The laws afford equal justice to all alike in their private disputes, but we do not ignore the claims of excellence. When a citizen distinguishes himself, then he will be called to serve the state, in preference to others, not as a matter of privilege, but as a reward of merit; and poverty is no bar.

... The freedom we enjoy extends also to ordinary life; we are not suspicious of one another, and we do not nag our neighbor if he chooses to go his own way. ... But this freedom does not make us lawless. We are taught to respect the magistrates and the laws, and never to forget that we must protect the injured. And we are also taught to observe those unwritten laws whose sanction lies only in the universal feeling of what is right....

Our city is thrown open to the world; we never expel a foreigner.... We are free to live exactly as we please, and yet, we are always ready to face any danger.... We love beauty without indulging in fancies, and although we try to improve our intellect. this does not weaken our will.... To admit one's poverty is no disgrace with us; but we consider it disgraceful not to make an effort to avoid it. A [CENSUUR!] citizen does not neglect public affairs when attending to his private business.... We consider a man who takes no interest in the state not as harmless, but as useless; and although only a few may originate a policy, we are all able to judge it. We do not look upon discussion as a stumbling block in the way of political action, but as an indispensable preliminary to acting wisely....

2 opmerkingen:

Ivan Janssens zei

Geen flauw idee. Lijkt wel iets met Athene te maken, voor Christus?

Koen Robeys zei

jaHeel goed, hoor. "Athene voor Christus" zou wat vaag zijn als er heel veel bloeiperiodes waren geweest, maar iedereen weet natuurlijk meteen dat je vijf eeuwen voor Christus bedoelt.

En dit is van Pericles zelf. Mooi, hé?